It is one big ball of sensor readings that influence each other.
Merlin wrote:I have looked a the sheets in detail and I can see that the dyno is not reading torque properly over 5K or so. The torque curves do not increase after VTEC, are not as sustained as other dyno results and fall off very quickly. On other dyno's torque hardly dips until after 7K. On this dyno it show my torque dropping off after 6500, Macky 5750, Andy 5250, and newkid 5750. To say that a VTEC engine doesn't produce more torque once VTEC kicks in (Yo) is bullshit. Your arse dyno tells you that isnt true. The rate of acceleration is much more in VTEC than out of VTEC and that is purely down to torque. After looking on the net a bit more it seems that this is a common issue with the DynoDynamics, not reading torque properly over 5K ish.
I compared my graph with the one from Dino's last dyno and were matched each other (almost to the exact torque/bhp) until 4500rpm. After that the DynoDynamics dyno screwed it up.
I have also spotted a potential reason why some cars gave less of a loss on that dyno in comparison with the Honda's. The DynoDynamics Dyno is a load bearing dyno, it puts a resistive force on the roller and measures the torque against the resistance. The amount of resistance added is the Ramp Rate (RR on the dyno sheets). 4cly N/a cars are ran at a ramp rate of 100 while the Focus ST (4cly FI) was ran at a ramp rate of 150. The ST loss was approaching half that of the N/a Honda's.
The more I look at the results and the graphs the more I think the DynoDynamics platform is crap (maybe more to do with the Hypertech one). Doesn't read torque properly, graphs don't show rpm correctly, graphs don't show torque accurately and the graphs don't show anything to do with power at the wheels. Considering the dyno reads power at the wheel and calculates back to the fly, why doesn't it give a whp reading